Hey
Ian McCallion wrote:
> I would like to hear this debate. My vote would be for you to continue to
> use EJB-INTEREST.
I would agree.
> I think this is indeed worth following up on...
>
> <snip>
>
> ...I held a discussion last week with some people early this week and we
> thought that perhaps one can extend the notion of component to mean a group
> of EJB's as opposed to a single EJB(point of debate/discussion!)...
>
> <snip>
>
> ...Should we continue this thread or take it out of the list and continue
> via
> direct e-mail? thoughts people :)
I might be thinking of something completely different, but it would be
useful to let a bean be a set of EJB's. Currently we are using the
BeanContext API to manage this rather coarse grained structure, but
other options would be interesting as well.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
