Hey
Wei Jiang wrote:
> Your answer below is a very good one.
> these extensions can be any thing, something I can
> image, some other things I can not image now.
>
> Jonas is designed as a "core" (for my understanding).
> It needs a lot of extensions.
>
> > 2) If they are server components, how do clients
> > (including
> > EJBs) find them?
>
> This proposal suggests:
> ForeignAffairs starts extensions and registers them.
> So clients can find them be naming look up.
>
> Server can find them directly from ForeignAffairs.
Your proposal seems to have many (and I mean *lots*) of similarities
with the upcoming Connector API and the JMX API.
IMHO I don't think you should try to convince anyone to adopt this
proposal. A more practical approach would be to try and become a
participant in the Connector and JMX specification processes, as they
ave more or less the same goal. Not sure if they're still open though.
You'll have to check with JCP admins.
Good luck
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
