Dirk Willecke wrote:
> How should a container achieve the correct result in-memory, i.e. without
> synchronization? In the case of BMP the logic of the finder methods is
> expressed (for example)in a sql statement. How should the container
> know if a dirty bean already involved in the transaction satisfies
> the sql condition? I think with CMP an in-memory-strategy is possible
> to implement, but with BMP there is no chance without synchronization.
> Or the specification must be changed, for example there must be a
> mandatory boolean testXXX method for each findXXX method.
Very good points. I like your proposed testXXX solution too. How about it Sun?
Ian McCallion
CICS Business Unit
IBM Hursley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: ++44-1962-818065
Fax: ++44-1962-818069
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
