Hey
Benjamin Bonnet wrote:
> According to the spec. : "The lifetime and scope of a handle is specific to the
> handle implementation."
> Besides: " An EJB Container is not required to accept a handle that was
> generated by another vendor's EJB Container."
> Handles are not as miraculous as they seem at first sight.
So, in other words: don't use handles as longlived references to beans.
Even within the scope of the handle implementation they are not a good
idea to use as it is not specified whether or not it should include the
name of the EJB server which the object lives on. If it is included your
entire database will break if you move your system to another machine
(unless you move the DNS name to the new server at the same time!).
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
