Hi,
Rickard is right : see EJB specs 1.1, 6.4.1. for stateful sessions. You will
find the same thing concerning CMP-Entity fields ( 9.4.1) .
Benjamin
Rickard �berg a �crit :
> "Lahooti, Hamid" wrote:
> > Yes, but you still need to lookup the Home interface
> > and use that to create a remote interface and you
> > end up with a proxy.
>
> No, it is allowed in EJB1.1 to have bean fields which are direct
> references to RMI stubs. The container should be able to manage them
> correctly (preferably by using Handles and object serialization
> replacement mechanism).
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> @home: +46 13 177937
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
