> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stu Halloway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Montag, 22. November 1999 19:52
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: The Future of EJB
>
>
> Async calls are cool, but do they really belong in the EJB
> spec? Many async
Where else? In my opinion, if it is a framework thing, it
belongs into the spec.
> features can be implemented with a client-side library on top
> of RMI, which
> would work for distributed Java objects in general, instead
> of just EJB. Of
One major issue for us is that which simulated async EJB calls,
you cannot get multiple replies.
> course, there is some benefit to standardizing the "poll" and
> "callback"
> interfaces of a generic async library, but this could be done
> as a separate
> spec which leverages RMI.
Yes, general async RMI would really be nice.
>
> Stu Halloway
> DevelopMentor
>
> ==============================================================
> =============
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help,
> send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
