Hi!
Sanjay Nambiar wrote:
> But wasn't there an earlier posting that there can be two in memory copies
> of the same underlying row in the database....??
> How would that problem be solved if two clients were to access the same row
> at the same time with two differnet instances of the bean.
Yes, that would be a problem with certain implementations. Also, I was
under the impression that the original poster wanted to do "long
transactions" with this locking mechanism, so using normal transactions
to solve the problem is a bad idea.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
