>I think this comparison is a bit unjustified. MS offers a PRODUCT RANGE for
>this area. EJBs or should I rather say J2EE ist a TECHNOLOGY. How can you
>comapre one to the oter? <snip>
I do no t say we should drop J2EE and switch to the full NT
server package, including IIS, ASP, MTS etc.
What I do say is that J2EE is very much silent on the
HTML client side, while MicroSoft is doing a fine job in this area.
We are using
IE5+HTML Data Binding+ADO+XML+XSLT+HTC(a.k.a. HTML behaviours)
on the client but
JSP+NES+JRun+Oracle+HP-UX on the server.
Best regards
Javier Borrajo
www.tid.es
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
