Jose,
While we are complaining, how about:
- Need a portable way to model singletons
- Need a standard way for CMP to handle non-Entity Bean dependent data.
I am holding out to see how the integration of JMS and EJB plays out before
complaining about callbacks and events...
Regards,
-Chris.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jose Gonzalez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 7:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EJB 2.0... when???
>
>
> This one is for the guys at Sun:
>
> We all know EJB 1.1 spec has several drawbacks that make difficult
> to model a serious bussiness model with this version. Some of these
> drawbacks:
>
> 1. No relationship between EJB, neither inheritance nor associations
> (you know, one to many, many to many, the kind of relationship used in a
> ER or OO model)
> 2. EJB is request/response oriented, so it seems a callback
> mechanism is difficult to implement
> 3. Home interfaces support only create/find methods.
>
> These drawbacks are to be fixed in v2.0 of the EJB specs, and it
> seems a new version of J2EE RI will be released with this version... am
> I right? is there a expected release date? why wasn't this taken into
> account in v1.1 of the specs? specially point 1... IMHO a way to specify
> an inheritance or association relationship between entities is a basic
> feature for a component model that is intended to represent data in any
> serious enterprise database
>
> Regards
> Jose << File: Card for Jose Gonzalez >>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
