See inline,
"Kenneth D. Litwak" wrote:
> When I first took a course on EJBs I was told that the 2.0 spec for EJBs
> would resolve the ambiguity between a container and aserver, so that you could
> assemble an application in a container and sellthe whole thing, container and
> all, or at least move it transparently between EJB severs. This was a major
> part of teh EJB vision, a core piee of what makes EJBs a better alternative than
> just using an app server.
Look at the CORBA Components (CORBA3) at OMG. You will learn more about portability
of Container.
>
>
> I know others proably knew about his alrady, but I recently learned that
> SUn has dropped this idea altogether becuase the EJB vendors won't play ball.
> They refuse to allow a standard definition of a container or serer, thus making
> container portability virtually impossible. This seems to me to be sucha major
> loss to the EJB vision that I am wondering if what is left is sufficient by
> itself.
The great EJB vision has always been component portability, not container
portability.
Francis.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
