----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Raber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple Session Beans in a Transaction
> I disagree, "chaining" session beans is a problem only if they are
stateful.
> Stateless components can be nested without such concerns.
That's what I said- what are you disagreeing with, Chris:~?>
> -Chris.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Murali Krishna Devarakonda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 9:15 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Multiple Session Beans in a Transaction
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roger M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 5:09 PM
> > Subject: Multiple Session Beans in a Transaction
> >
> >
> > > Is it possible to have a transaction spanning multiple
> > > session bean objects ? Assuming all the session beans
> > > are stateful
> >
> > It's a really bad idea to chain stateful session beans.
> > See Monson-Haefel's book (Oreilly press) for a detailed explanation, but
> > the
> > issue is timeouts.
> >
[...chop...]
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
