[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think the advice others gave about making the leaf classes be the only
> EJBs is appropriate if you need to deliver EJBs now that have no dependency
> on EJB server support beyond the scope of the EJB1.1 spec. The project
> I've been working on doesn't have that restriction, so we've been using
> inheritance of EJBs, and counting on the spec to address it relatively soon
> so that our EJBs can become fully spec compliant then.
This is good, especially coming from an IBMer. I'm beginning to think
that might not be such a bad idea.
How are you handling creations? Are your (inherited) ejbCreate()
methods all starting out with super.ejbCreate() invocations?
Cheers,
Laird
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
