sriram wrote:
> But that doesnt mean that the evaluators can publish without consulting the
> vendors nor they can publish all those that are restricted by the vendors. It
> would have been easier if the evaluators had contacted the vendors before
> publishing to confirm whether they used the right version of the vendors
> product in their evalutaion.
I agree partially with this.
On the other hand, I liked the test because it seemed to be a real-world
example of people simply trying to get software running. Purely
personally, I'd be most interested in any application that runs best
when deployed by someone who may not be an expert but who is capable of
following instructions. Another way to put this is that I would tend to
look askance at a solution that can only yield decent performance and
scalability when deployed by an expert.
Interesting issues.
Cheers,
Laird
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
