i think using java traction API you can commit the
work from the client side( which is your servlet )
i am not sure with this solution just try this
chandrakumar
--- Stu Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Bean E's work can complete separately from what A
> & B are doing, then you
> could set the transaction property on Bean E to
> TX_REQUIRES_NEW, which would
> force an ejbStore.
>
> If E's update to the database and B's query are
> closely related, you could
> move B's work into E and use bean-managed
> persistence.
>
> I certainly wouldn't say you cannot mix EBs and SBs,
> but if they are
> touching the same data you have to be careful to
> avoid problems like the one
> you are having. You are lucky--if WebLogic's
> implementation wrote through
> more often, your code would have worked for now, and
> mysteriously failed
> later on some other container or version.
>
> Stuart Halloway
> DevelopMentor
> http://www.develop.com/hp/halloway
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans
> development
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Mike Williams
> > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 12:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Problem mixing Session Beans and Entity
> Beans
> >
> >
> > I have a problem.
> >
> > We have a servlet (S) that calls a session-bean
> (A) to perform an update.
> > Bean A uses an entity-bean (E) to update the
> status of a database entity
> > (let's call it Thing), then calls another
> session-bean (B) to get
> > a list of
> > Things with a particular status. Bean B accesses
> the database directly,
> > using JDBC.
> >
> > We're expecting the Thing that was just updated to
> be included in
> > this list,
> > but it's not. Seems that the problem is that the
> EJB container (WebLogic)
> > does not call E.ejbStore() before B does it's
> query. The EJB
> > spec suggests
> > that this is quite normal behaviour ... just a
> shame that we didn't
> > understand it before.
> >
> > So, what to do?? Seems that we either have to
> pick either
> > session-beans OR
> > entity-beans to perform database-access, and not
> try to mix the two. Is
> > that a valid conclusion?
> >
> > Recommendations?
> >
> > --
> > Mike Williams
> > http://www.o3.co.uk
> >
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general
> help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the
> message "help".
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
