Laird Nelson wrote:
>
> MARK HAPNER wrote:
> > It is true that EJB 1.1 does not provide the facilities needed to
> > implement a long running business process as an EJB. One of the goals of
> > EJB 2.0 is to address this by providing a specification for message
> > driven beans.
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
> > You should note that simply providing threading within an EJB is not
> > sufficient to implement such a business process.
>
> Correct.
>
> > While it might provide
> > a very primitive way of adding asynchrony it does not provide the basic
> > foundation needed to support the implementation of reliable, long lived
> > business processes.
>
> Absolutely correct. But there are still scenarios in which threading is
> a preferable alternative to messaging systems. Sounds to me like
> threading isn't even on the horizon, then?
Nothing is in the pipe.
>
> Argh; I've *got* to get my company in on the JCP....
>
> Cheers,
> Laird
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
