Hey
Hm.. first you say this:
> This boils down to the fact that some application servers started out as web
> application servers and then turned into ejb application servers while still
> keeping their legacy architecture. Net Dynamics is an example of this. I
> used NetDyanmics many years ago and at the time is was a good solution. But
> that was then.
.. and then you say this:
> Now when people are looking for a EJB Server they should
> consider only ones that where built from the ground up for EJB 1.1 and based
> on a mature and proven infrastructure such as CORBA.
.. which makes for a rather contradictory statement all in all... "throw
away the legacy infrastructure!" AND "keep the legacy infrastructure!".
What's it gonna be? ;-)
Cut the (rather obvious) marketing undertones out and you get:
"Consider only ones that where built from the ground up for EJB 1.1."
That's more like it.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dreambean.com
Question reality
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
