Assaf Arkin wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> So far the discussion has been about the useability of thread support,
> and no one contradicted their usability. I'm not sure JMS is sufficient
> for what developers have in mind, and connectors would be an overkill
> for many applications.
>
> It's clear that EJB 1.1 should not support threads, nor the applications
> should attempt to use them.
>
> But what about adding that support to a future version of EJB?
>
> If enough people request it, you will see it being supported by the
> major vendors, which unless properly specified, will break the WORA
> promise of EJB.
I would have to support this. We have already added our own proprietary
thread management API for use by EJBs, since our customers cannot wait
any longer for this. We would love to see this area standardized.
________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EAServer Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington, New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
