Rickard �berg wrote:
> I don't see any compelling reason to make another type of bean that
> duplicates the functionality already available in JMX. JMX beans are
> portable between different servers supporting JMX, they are manageable,
> they can interact in whatever fashion you like with EJB's, etc etc.
Really? Don't they open sockets and listen for incoming management
requests on them? Isn't this in violation of the EJB 1.1 specification?
{rummage rummage rummage}
Cheers,
Laird
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
