As per the EJB spec this is not legal. Ultimately it is the bean which will
be involved in the socket communication. And different vendor may behave
differently in such case.
-Anurag
>From: Gustavo E Tenrreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Sockets and EJB's
>Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:25:13 -0800
>
>the ejb1.1 specs state that an ejb must not listen, read or write to a
>socket.
>
>In the following case:
>
> ejb A has a method "M" that instanciates a class B, and B opens a socket
>and reads from it.
>
> is A consider to be opening the socket as well, or is this legal and you
>can say that A did not open a socket even though B did.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Gustavo E Tenrreiro
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>work: (650) 413-5565
>cell : (408) 373-8595
>home: (408) 225-7097
>
>===========================================================================
>To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
>of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
