> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damian Mehers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 8:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Valuetypes and COM (was RE: Why smoke signals matter)
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 12:42:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >IMO the problem with J-Integra is, that there is no direct COM-CORBA
> >communication. You always have a Java-Layer with its VM on
> the client.
>
> You don't need a JVM on the Windows client machine which
> talks to an EJB.
>
> [Java Object<--jintegra.jar]<--dcom<--[COM client]
>
ok. That's new to me. But it still seems to me, that J-Integra in
conjunction with an Application Server is a bottleneck. AFAIK you need to
register J-Integra with machine name and port# on the client machine - so
what's about failover; what's about the scalability of my application
server, if all calls goes through J-Integra.
I would be glad to hear, that you solved all that problems.
Mit freundlichen Gr��en
With kind regards
Ulf Gohde
System Architect
CE Computer Equipment AG Fon: +49 (0)521 9318-167
Herforder Str. 155a Fax: +49 (0)521 9318-444
33609 Bielefeld E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Germany http://www.ce-ag.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
