"Louth, William (Exchange)" wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> In the inprise documentation they do elaborate on this association a bit
> more:
>
> Sidebar:
> Implementing this parallel transaction feature is non-trivial for most EJB
> container vendors, because it requires a relatively sophisticated
> server-side object dispatch model. What is required is the ability to
> dispatch on a server-side object using both the primary key (which is
> usually embedded in the object reference) and the current transaction. Doing
> this multi-key dispatch is very hard to implement on top of an RMI or BOA
> style server-side model, which is why no other EJB container provides this
> functionality. We leverage the POA, which is a server- side frame-work which
> is much more sophisticated, and which is much more conducive to implementing
> this functionality.
The Inprise technical writers would be well-advised not to make unsubstantiated
claims about "other EJB" containers. They are wrong.
________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EAServer Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington, New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
