My understanding is that the vendor would have to have an RMI implementation
that allows for propagation of such context. We use CORBA and tuck the
context into IIOP tags... Non IIOP based solutions have their own RMI
implementation that (should) allows for this.

-Chris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Sauer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 9:37 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: Transaction context: Session Bean - non EJB - Session
> Bean
>
> That makes sense. My mistake...
> I was under the impression that it got propagated through
> the bean's context, but that's just an access mechanism,
> not a propagation mechanism I understand now. Now as for
> Jeff's RMI comment in this thread.... How would that work?
> With the RMI object in a separate VM, the propagation through
> thread model doesn't hold, does it?
>
> Frank
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Raber
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 6:58 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Transaction context: Session Bean - non EJB -
> > Session Bean
> >
> >
> > Well I am not sure what the spec says, but in GemStone/J the
> > transaction
> > context is propagated with the thread and along any
> > distrubted component
> > invocations. So within a single JVM the transaction context propagates
> > through the thread. I would expect other servers to do similar?
> >
> > -Chris.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Frank Sauer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 6:26 PM
> > > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject:      Re: Transaction context: Session Bean - non
> > EJB - Session
> > > Bean
> > >
> > > I'm not sure. How would the transaction context get propagated
> > > through the non-bean object to the second session bean?
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Raber
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 1:29 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: Transaction context: Session Bean - non EJB -
> > > > Session Bean
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a bug. Check with WL forums...
> > > >
> > > > -Chris.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Graham Parsons [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:21 AM
> > > > > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject:      Transaction context: Session Bean - non EJB -
> > > > Session Bean
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a Session Bean that calls a non-EJB Java class
> > > > which in turn calls
> > > > > another Session Bean.
> > > > >
> > > > > If we make both beans container managed transaction
> > > > demarcation, and the
> > > > > business method on the second bean have a "MANDATORY"
> > transaction
> > > > > requirement, we get a transaction does not exists error.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, I am told that if we make the first bean bean
> > > > managed transaction
> > > > > demarcation then all seems to work.
> > > > >
> > > > > The deployment environment is Weblogic 4.5.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Graham
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ==============================================================
> > > > ============
> > > > > =
> > > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > > > include in the
> > > > > body
> > > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help,
> > > > send email to
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the
> > message "help".
> > > >
> > > > ==============================================================
> > > > =============
> > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > > > include in the body
> > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help,
> > > > send email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the
> > message "help".
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > ==============================================================
> > ============
> > > =
> > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > include in the
> > > body
> > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help,
> > send email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
> > ==============================================================
> > =============
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > include in the body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help,
> > send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to