Yup. Its a good design, too.
--On Friday, May 19, 2000 6:07 PM +0100 Edward Barrett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of our EJBs have no implementation in the interface methods
> (ejbLoad, etc.) and we end up 'coding' a lot of empty methods.
>
> Is it possible to have a super class (which in turn extends EJBObject)
> that implements these empty methods and our beans in turn just override
> the one's of interest ?
>
> Regards
>
> Ed
>
> =========================================================================
> == To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
