> > <vendor> > This is an option in jBoss (settable in the deployment XML per > application), and the default value is "No restrictions". IMHO this > should be yes, but since JDBC drivers tend to break when > setting this to > true (as they don't use doPrivileged properly) this is better. For now > at least. > </vendor> > Isn't it possible for a proxy JDBC driver to call doPriviledged for those broken JDBC drivers? Since there already is a proxy JDBC driver in place, it may as well give loaded drivers all the permissions they need. - Avi -- s/\be(\w+)/e-\1/g; =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Application specific Properties files? More, Yogesh
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Ashwani Kalra
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Rickard �berg
- Re: Application specific Properties files? James Cook
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Rickard �berg
- Re: Application specific Properties files? James Cook
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Avi Kivity
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Rickard �berg
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Nicholas Whitehead
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Juan Pablo Lorandi
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Leonard Thomas
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Rickard �berg
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Laird Nelson
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Rickard �berg
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Laird Nelson
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Laird Nelson
- Re: Application specific Properties files? Nicholas Whitehead
