>At 04:29  27/07/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>I'm using a char(40) to hold my unique ids. The actual generation of the UID
>>is database specific (Sybase), and I contend that a persistence mechanism
>>must be involved in order to get a truly unique id. I'm also employing Scott
>>Ambler's (i'm sure the original inventor is credited somewhere, Scott
>>recently wrote a quality article about the technique) High-Low technique,
>>which forces me to access the database once per 10,000 keys generated.
>>
>>I take the generated sequence number and create an SHA hash. This gives me a
>>wonderfully cryptic UID that I can use as a PK in my database, or a session
>>id for a cookie. I'm somewhat guaranteed that a viewer of the hash won't be
>>able to reverse engineer the value to get the original sequence.
>
>Jim,
Sorry...disregard above post...slippery fingers...

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to