William Louth wrote:
>
> Laird,
>
> I do not understand why the 'lite' class must throw remote exceptions. Its
> not a interface that is subsequently extended by some remote interface going
> by the statements
>
> 'TeacherLite, a Java class'
> 'TeacherBean, a Java class which extends TeacherLite'
Exactly.
> Please note that the attributes i.e. fields, would need to be declared
> public in the lite class so no accessor methods would be typically be
> required hence no checked exceptions.
Well, that's another way of doing it, but I'm very much against public
attributes unless there's a really good reason for it.
Dale
================================
Dale V. Georg
Technical Manager
Indus Consultancy Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(201) 261-3100 x229
================================
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
