> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hussman, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 17:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EJB Passivate
>
>
> Avi
>
> >There is a slight difference: when using entity beans, the
> instance state
> >must be kept for the duration of the transaction (i.e., the
> instance is
> >associated with a transaction for the duration of the entire
> transaction,
> >unless it is passivated).
>
> Do you mean the bean is passivated by the container? If not,
> have you been
Yes, of course.
> able to
> "force" the container to passivate, thus allowing re-use of pooled
> resources?
>
I imagine you can force the container to passivate (if it supports entity
bean passivation) by starting large transactions which encompass many beans;
more than the pool size. I've never tried it, though.
- Avi
--
s/\be(\w+)/e-\1/g;
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
