Kurt,
<vendor>
I am a little surprised at this, as we ship an example which uses
base classes to share behavior:
<ias>/examples/ejb/school
(Thus, I'd have to guess that you are doing something wrong, lowly
application developer that you are ;-)
However, as this is a vendor-specific issue, please bring it to:
news://forums.inprise.com/inprise.public.appserver
</vendor>
-jkw
"Christensen, Kurt" wrote:
>
> We have entity bean implementation classes that derive some common behavior
> from a base class. I believe the EJB 1.1 spec allows this. When we tried to
> deploy these beans into IAS they didn't work. They did, however, work fine
> in the J2EE RI, which is what we are now using for development.
>
> Then again, we could have done something incorrectly. After all, us lowly
> application developers aren't even smart enough to write our own hashCode()
> methods ;-)
>
> KurtC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Louth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FatKey Pattern...
>
> <snipped/>
>
> Unlike some vendors who still have to open their mouths regarding many
> issues including the ridiculous level of posts relating to getting their
> silly little appserver up and running never mind the rest.
>
> <snipped/>
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
