Nitin Kumar wrote:
>
> Jonathan:
>
> Thanks for the reply. But I think I need to further explain my Query. I am not
> talking about the EJB Implementatation Object, I know each client gets its own
> instance from the Pool. I am talking about the EJBHome implementation
> instance. Since we search with the same name in the JNDI for the EJBHome, does
> that mean that all clients are talking to the same EJBHome Object
> Implementation instance?? If that is true, how is it handled by the
> implementation if say 20 client try to invoke a same Finder or Create method
> on this single Remote Object implementation? Will this be thread safe (Does it
> really need to be thread safe?), will it have any performance bottlenecks?? I
> am not clear? please provide your comments.
The app. server should take care of this. In the case of Sybase EAServer there
aren't even any real implementation objects for the EJBHome's as all the home
operations are carried out by delegation from a static method.
________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EAServer Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington, New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
