Christopher Cobb wrote:
>
> My dependent object is already a subservient table. How bad would it be to make
>JDBC calls to that table myself instead of serializing. I was thinking that ejbLoad
>and ejbStore should probably not be used with CMP -- but if I'm going to use them,
>I'd probably tend to want to use JDBC. Are there 'transactional' reasons not to use
>my own JDBC calls within a transactional bean?
No, but you must connect to the database correctly. If you lift an old JDBC code
fragment out of a non-EJB application and adapt that your JDBC calls will indeed
be completely independent of the transactions controlled by your app server.
The driver you use must be registered with the app server and the correct way to
get hold of one that is registered is via JNDI lookup and appropriate
configuration of the server.
cheers... Ian
Ian McCallion
Alexis Systems Limited
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
