This may seem tangential, but are Java 2 Collections considered ordered?
There is clearly no restriction that they can't be ordered, but somebody for
some reason decided to use Collection for the return type of multi-object
finders instead of List.
Cheers
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Monson-Haefel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EJB 2.0: EJB QL no ORDER BY clause
EJB QL is missing an ORDER BY clause. I think this is an important
omissions. This feature should be supported by just about every target
environment, so why isn't included in EJB QL?
NOTE:
If you are interested in debating the virtues of EJB QL itself, kindly
do so in a separate thread. I'm just looking for feedback on this one
issue.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Richard Monson-Haefel
Author of Enterprise JavaBeans, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly 2000)
Co-Author of Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000)
http://www.jMiddleware.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
