There isn't a "right" vendor... Well, not until I get on someone's payroll!
:-) You will need to do some research to see which implementation is best
for your palnned architecture. Here's a good start:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-02-2001/jw-0223-extremescale.html
Gene
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rupa Schomaker
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:23 PM
To: Gene Chuang
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: True failover for stateful session beans?
Gene Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stateful session failover implementation is vendor-specific, but if you
pick
> the right vendor, you will not have to worry about any of the questions
you
> just asked. Not only can you store the session bean's Handle in a
> replicated HttpSession, but you can also some vendors provide failover
> Stateful Session beans altogether.
>
> Gene
which is the right vendor?
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
