use cmp provided by the app server if at all possible. use toplink or
cocobase or some other o/r if cmp by app server is not sufficient. finally,
if these fail use bmp and hand code your persistence. bmp is a pain to do
properly. people use bmp because currently cmp implementation don't support
a lot of things, like associations and dependent objects.
--tinou
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rein Reezigt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:14 PM
Subject: [EJB-INT] CMP or BMP?
> Hello all,
>
> I wonder if there is any reason why to choose BMP over CMP . Whenever I
> talk to people , they seem to implement things using BMP. Is this
> because of performance differences? Or are people just 'afraid' to give
> the data control away?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rein Reezigt
> student computer science
> Hogeschool Enschede, the Netherlands
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
