> Wouldn't something instead along the lines of
> "LocalHomeClass.getReference()" be a better idea?
> Another argument for something along the above lines
> would be that local and remote interfaces are not
> interchangeable and the fact that you cannot 'convert'
> one to the other. So in fact, they are fundamentally
> different, and behave differently as well (pass by
> reference et al).
>
You may want to deploy a single home interface as multiple EJB homes - to
support multiple versions, multiple implementations, or multiple deployment
options (for example, deploy an EJB family with read-write semantics and
with read-only, cacheable semantics).
- Avi
--
This signature intentionally left blank.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".