> From: Joel Riedesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> And? What does that mean? Are you suggesting I write my own EJBGen?
> Or is this something that you generally make available?
Sorry, forgot to include the URL: http://beust.com/cedric/ejbgen.
The version on the Web site doesn't support Local Interfaces, though, I will
upload the new one soon, it's been working pretty well so far.
> I'm not at liberty to explain my architecture. However, suffice it to
> say that objects in our system may be used both locally and
> remotely. The design is a purely remote design but one wants local
> access a majority of the time for performance. If the beans in the
> system are all running in the same VM then they all want to use local
> access to each other. That's all I'm talking about. No big thing.
Understood. I tend to overemphasize the local/remote guidelines because the
pattern "entity=local, session=remote" is not widely known yet. Your needs
are obviously different and you know what you're doing, so having remote
entity beans and other non-conventional patterns makes sense.
--
Cedric
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
