Maybe to preserve & cherish the RDBMS ("legacy", oh how I hate it when they
call every >24hr aged technology "legacy") name for this type of operation.
- Avi
--
This signature intentionally left blank.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian McCallion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 16:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cascade-delete
>
>
> In CMP 2.0, <cascade-delete/> seems to means no more or less than:
>
> If this entity is removed, then remove these other entities,
> applying the full semantics of remove at each stage.
>
> So why is it not called <cascade-remove/>? Is there a
> subtlety in the spec that
> I've missed so that <cascade-remove/> would be misleading?
>
>
>
> ========================================
> Ian McCallion
> Alexis Systems Limited
> Romsey, UK
> Tel: +44 1794 514883
> Fax: +44 1794 501692
> ========================================
>
> ==============================================================
> =============
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help,
> send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
