hi!!
> From: Esmond Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:05:47 +1000
>
> Telekinesis Pty Ltd announces the general release of the RMI Proxy 1.0.
>
if I wanted to use rmiproxy with jndi+(normal)rmi based EJB container,
does it still work?
naive idea: preparing a separate rmiregistry and re-binding
everything that was in original jndi name space into this
appears to almost solve the problem,
but then, if the jndi operation itself(like the lookup()) is
rmi based (?) there is actually no need to do things like
the above in the first place.(??)
not that simple, maybe?
kenji
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
