I don't know what you were disagreeing with before - IIOP can be passed through a firewall, there are several products that do so. I didn't claim it was best but some of these operations you're talking about are expensive and don't scale very well. XML can be used in a good negotiation/discovery protocol but if I were planning a system with high traffic I'd drop down to something else for subsequent communications once I'd determined the sender/receiver.
>From: Kevin Bedell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Kevin Bedell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: XML over Http vs EJB technology >Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 06:59:58 -0800 > >I disagree somewhat with this. I think that XML over >HTTP can be looked at as a relatively simple way to >use "distributed service" or "distributed component" >architecture. EJB's as distributed components are a >more complex implementation and more limited. > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
