> In addition to Avalon, you might look at HP's Common Services Framework
> (underlying their HP-Internet Server and HP-Application Server) or the
> Enhydra Services Architectures underlying the Lutris Enhydra App Server.
> Both these frameworks are being considered as APIs or concept-sources
> for the JSR-111 work and might be very useful to someone doing a mixture
> of J2EE and custom-components (services). Of course, until/unless
> JSR-111 (or JSR-159, which is probably better for this purpose because
> it's J2EE-specific) blesses a standard, any work you do in this way is
> subject to some level of vendor lock-in...
>
Oh, my, does *this* just point out all the egg on my face; Jonathon Maron,
who I believe is in charge of the HP framework, is the JSR-111 Expert Group
Lead. :)
Ted Neward
{.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, DevelopMentor
(http://www.develop.com)
http://www.javageeks.com/tneward
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Stidolph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [EJB-INT] EJB & ClassLoading
> Ted Neward wrote:
>
> >...
> >
> >Shone, I'm afraid that the explicit component management that you're
looking
> >for isn't there in EJB. What you *really* wanted, rather than porting the
> >app over to EJB, was to use something that conformed to JSR-111, the
> >Services API JSR, which isn't even close to being finished yet. :/ Having
> >said that, though....
> >
> >...
> >
> >Had I been around when you were considering the port, I'd have suggested
you
> >not do it; unfortunately, that's water under the bridgework. You might
take
> >a look at Apache Avalon (Berin Loritsch is on the JSR 111 Expert Group)
as
> >another Services Framework, you might take a look at JNLP as a deployment
> >framework, and I humbly suggest you might find a few ideas in my
> >"Server-Based Java Programming" book.
> >
> >Ted Neward
> >{.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, DevelopMentor
> >(http://www.develop.com)
> >http://www.javageeks.com/tneward
> >
> In addition to Avalon, you might look at HP's Common Services Framework
> (underlying their HP-Internet Server and HP-Application Server) or the
> Enhydra Services Architectures underlying the Lutris Enhydra App Server.
> Both these frameworks are being considered as APIs or concept-sources
> for the JSR-111 work and might be very useful to someone doing a mixture
> of J2EE and custom-components (services). Of course, until/unless
> JSR-111 (or JSR-159, which is probably better for this purpose because
> it's J2EE-specific) blesses a standard, any work you do in this way is
> subject to some level of vendor lock-in...
>
> Wayne Stidolph
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
