----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: Re: As a Person Looking into EJB...


> Hi there, I am sorry, but this does not seem to be the answers to the
> original "As a person" thread in which I got very interested. Has there
been
> something offline? I would like to hear comments about the first
questions.
>
> Kindly,
>
> Luis.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:17 AM
> Subject: Re: As a Person Looking into EJB...
>
>
> > Hi Atong,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atong Appa
> > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:17 PM
> > >
> > > I have a few issues with EJB's persistence.  In fact, the
> > > first one of these
> > > problems is not even unique to EJB, but OO paradigm in
> > > general.  Many of
> > > objects has many columns of data (over 100 columns).  When an
> > > application is
> > > running, the user typically works only with only a handful of
> > > these columns
> > > (human beings are not equipped to deal with 100's of pieces
> > > of info all at
> > > once).
> > >
> > > So, different applications ('modules' to be exact) work on
> > > different subsets
> > > of this large number of columns.  Yet, the business logic must be
> > > centralized and managed in the context of one object class (like you
> > > mentioned).
> > >
> > > The problem is that OO paradigm wants the entire object to be
> > > realized in
> > > memory before anything happens.  This causes memory usage problems,
> > > scalability problems, and performance problems.  Previously,
> > > we've attempted
> > > to implement 'partially initialized' object, but, like you
> > > said, this ended
> > > up strewing bits of SQL in many places--maintenance problems.
> > >
> > > For this kind of problems, EJB CMP is inappropriate.  With BMP, we are
> > > likely to end up with SQL spread out.  Is there something in
> > > EJB to help out
> > > with this kind of problem?
> > >
> >
> > Some vendors have optimizations for this type of thing. For instance,
> > Weblogic has the concept of field groups. Here's the documentation on
them
> > from the XDoclet docs on the @weblogic:field-group tag:
> >
> >
> >
> > A field-group represents a subset of the cmp and cmr-fields of a bean.
> > Related fields in a bean can be put into groups which are faulted
> > into memory together as a unit. A group can be associated with a
> > query or relationship, so that when a bean is loaded as the
> > result of executing a query or following a relationship, only the
> > fields mentioned in the group are loaded.
> >
> > A special group named 'default' is used for queriess and relationships
> > that have no group specified. By default, the 'default' group contains
> > all of a bean's cmp-fields and any cmr-fields that add a foreign key to
> the
> > persistent state of the bean.
> >
> > A field may belong to multiple groups. In this case, the getXXX() method
> > for the field will fault in the first group (lexically speaking) that
> > contains the field.
> >
> >
> >
> > In this way you can have partially initialized objects that only pull in
> > the pieces it thinks it needs... While this is a vendor-specific
> > optimization, it is mapped into the weblogic deployment descriptor, so
it
> > does not make your code any less portable (although you won't have these
> > optimizations on another product, unless they have something similar).
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Jason Carreira
> >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
> >
>

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to