I think what you mean here is that you want to maintain two sets of interfaces, that is: 1. A EJBlocalHome interface and a EJBLocalObject interface. 2. A EJBHome interface and a EJBObject interface.
This is perfectly legal. Sanjeev -----Original Message----- From: JavaSoft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EntityBean problem Hi all, is it legal that an entity bean has 4 interfaces ? 2 are Local interfaces, and other 2 are remote interfaces. Because my entity bean is used by 2 clients remotely and locally. The problem why dont i just make it remotely is because performnce. Remotely is slower than locally right ? while one of entity clients is in same jvm with the entity bean and need fast performance, thats why i want to use locally way to access the entity bean. === thx, a Java Addicted =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
