I can't say anything about EJB 2.0 local interfaces, but I can say something about remote interfaces being called locally versus local Java function calls. By "local Java function" call I simply mean one function calling another inside the same VM (i.e. no EJB intervention). Using WebSphere Application Server 4.0, I measured a 10,000:1 difference in peformance between the two. Calling a remote interface in the same VM took 10E-4 seconds and a local Java function call took 10E-8 seconds on my PIII 1.0Ghz box.
Mike Bresnahan -----Original Message----- From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duc Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Interfaces Vs Local Interfaces Hi, I am new to EJB I just wondering if any of you have tested the different in performance between Remote Interfaces and Local Interfaces in CMP Entity Bean. If yes what is the results ratio. Thanks, Duc =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
