> I basically fail to digest why people release something as FreeSource?I
> understand it is done to bring out the best. If so, then why is this
> concept not extended to other forms of "Engineering"? Why don’t people
> build bridges for free, why don’t people construct marvellous buildings
> for free?so that others can emulate and design better buildings?

Because I can sit down on a Saturday afternoon and write a useful program
with no more cost than my time and the computer I own. To build a bridge
or a building requires not only my effort, but expensive material, expensive
land, and expensive labor.

A better comparison might be to ask why recording artists do not place
some of their material into the public domain (or "open lyrics"). I think
in this case it is a matter of culture and history. The software industry
have a unique history and culture (IMO).

> Is it that human effort goes unpaid? Or do they get involved in a long
> term investment.

My pay off comes from the fact that I love to program. So I program. My
reward is the program that I produce.

I give my software away for two reasons. One, it saves others work. And
in return, I expect them to save me work. Two, it helps my career. I have
landed several good paying jobs based entirely on the exposure I got from
my open source projects. It also improves my skill.

==========================================================================To 
unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to