> Why are we not implementing the Remote interface directly in > Bean Class? Because the Container handles the instance of the EJB. If you do it directly do it you can directly access this pointer. This will completely change the life cycle handling of EJB. > In which scenario the bean is passivating and activating? This is done while managing the Pool.The Beans state is paasivated and again activated,Refer life cycle diagram in EJB spec. > Why all the classes must extend from java.lang.Object? Inside Java by James Gosling is the best book that you can read for these kind of things.
Ramki.
**************************Disclaimer************************************ Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. ***************************************************************************
