Dimitar Stavrakov wrote:
>
>
> The functionality provided to you by the EJB container is time that you
> cannot make up by a generator. Just think about connection pooling,

This can be done without a EJB container.  There are a number of free
and commercial implementations that do it.

> transaction management, etc.

You have to be more specific. JDBC does transactions.

> When you're using EJBs all these are ready for
> you to use, without having to write a single line of code. You can't beat
> that with straight JDBC coding.

Using all of that functionality, especially the first time for each
different container, takes a non-trivial amount of time to configure and
tune.  There is probably an EJB container that provides easy and clear
documentation that makes such chores a breeze.  However I haven't seen
it nor heard of it. (I spent a week one time trying to get a container
set up to do connection pooling with a particular database and driver
and I finally had to give up.)  That time also counts against the total
time for coding any new implementations.

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to