Just a guess but, it may be desirable to start a transaction before security
is checked to handle the case where the security information is held a
database. This way if the rights of a user changes during a transaction, the
transaction is rolled back.
Dain Sundstrom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Forder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 6:57 PM
> To: EJBoss
> Subject: jBoss 2.0: Order of interceptors
>
>
> The jBoss 2.0 EJB Container Documentation shows an incoming request
> being handled first by a Container invoker, then by a Log interceptor,
> then by a Tx interceptor, next by a Security interceptor (and so on).
>
> Shouldn't Security be handled before Transactions? If access
> is denied,
> there is no point doing anything to do with transactions.
>
> --
> Justin Forder
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
