Hi Marc !!! > <stop the craziness> Hmmm, that's what my mom used to say.... ;-) > Ok as I understood your question Fredrik, you are proposing to create a > new class for MS access (why? ;-) and you want to know the procedure... The reason for this was that some problems occurred when I used the Access or SQL Server, but not when using the included InstantDB or Hypersonic. I therefore thought that this was specific for the MS db's. My solution to this was to write a class that addressed these problems, but which after the changes were not general anymore. After my discussion with Rickard I realized that this was not the case, and that the problems occured due to bugs in the code (why I didn't think of that earlier one might wonder...). > As someone proposed some time ago, let's provide extensions, it is sort > of cleaner than cases and I apologize since I realize I was wrong on > that. The simplest is to extend the JAWSPer.... in your class in > override the method. My thought was to just make the needed changes in the existing code, not to override it in an extended class - but change the name of the "new" class so they wouldn't be mixed up. So my questions was really if this kind of "code reuse" was allowed, instead of me having to override every method and writing my own code - and since the rest of the code works great. Not that I would have taken credit for the existing code, I was merely curious how these things were done. > Note that if this is a real "cross DB" bug then as rickard points out > you should fix it in the base class. As far as naming goes, put the > stuff in bugzilla and propose something if the name is not to crazy it > will be fine. I will place a bug report in Bugzilla, but I have to say that Bugzilla's interface is not very user-friendly. This could however be because me......(yup!!!) > This code will need to be GPL as you "import" our code and we do want to > see that code back. > So the answer is yes! we want to see your code and writing a new > *extending* class is OK (make sure you write the factory with it, wait I > remember jBoss2.0 comes with it rigth?? integrate it with EJX then) Well, I have merely made some changed to the existing code, so that I can continue testing. I'll be happy to supply you with the changes, just tell me how to send to you... Regards, Fredrik... -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
