Hi, I would say : let's not worry for SARGE then, and concentrate on SID and ETCH.
Le dimanche 08 octobre 2006 à 12:03 +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : > Hi again, > > regarding sarge backports the story was longer than just the easy fix I > and start to remember why I hadn't done it back then already. Problem is > with intltool updated to a recent version, that configure still stalls > at: > configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gthread-2.0 >= > 2.4.0 esound >= 0.2.28 gconf-2.0 >= 2.2.0 libgnome-2.0 >= 2.14.0 > libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.14.0) were not met. > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard prefix. > > That means, we'd need to backport half of gnome effectively which is > more than I'm willing to maintain over a longer time. If someone really > wants to step up for it and *will* maintain it, please do send me a mail > to ask for instructions. Integration with the buildd is not the problem, > but I guess this will become ugly over time. So, right now, as sad as it > renders me, there will not be any sarge backports of Ekiga and Ekiga-cvs > until this is fixed. (and right now apt-get.org tells me there is no > such archive) > > _______________________________________________ > Ekiga-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Ekiga-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
