Le vendredi 16 février 2007 à 10:02 +0100, Karel Kulhavy a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:48:08PM -0800, George Boyd wrote: > > The problem I believe,is when reviewers test and compare software (in > > this case the article you mentioned), is that the reviewers are not > > fully aware of the potential or features of the software they are > > writing about. Reviewers should know the programs completely before they > > try to write comparison articles. > > Reviewers are writing reviews for ordinary users, and ordinary users typically > have only superficial knowledge of software. In today's world, where you are > using many pieces of software concurrently, learning each one in depth would > require too much time. > > I think it's OK when a reviewer writes a review from position of someone > who doesn't know the software completely. >
Probably, but there is a saying : compare what is actually comparable. Flexibility has a price. Perhaps Wengo has some features Ekiga doesn't have. But the opposite is also true. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ NOVACOM : http://www.novacom.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
