On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:29:58AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the speedy answer, David. I'm not really sure about the > relation between the spca5xx and the sn9c102 modules. Anway, I can give
sn9c102 is 'the' driver for that chip, however spca5xx may be more updated and support more feat.s. > it a try. Is the best way to prevent it from loading to remove > sn9c102.ko from the lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/modules.dep file? I think there are polite way of doing it, but I'm used to be rough here: # mv sn9c102.ko sn9c102.ko~ -- paolo _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
